Does "Decision Sent to Author " before the peer review stage - reddit We however included transfers in all other analyses because we considered the analysed items as combinations of three attributes: paper, corresponding author, and journal to which the paper was submitted. We also attempted to fit a generalized linear mixed effects model with a random effect for the country category, as we can assume that the data is sampled by country and observations from the same country share characteristics and are not independent. isolera golv plintgrund This agreement provides: A supported path for UC authors to publish open access in Springer's subscription-based and open access journals, including Springer, Springer Open, BioMed . Trends Ecol Evol. 0000002625 00000 n Res Integr Peer Rev 3, 5 (2018). Springer Nature. China and the USA stand out for their strong preference for DBPR and SBPR, respectively. The prestige of the corresponding authors institutions was measured from the data of the Global Research Identifier Database (GRID) by dividing institutions in three prestige groups with reference to the 2016 Times Higher Education (THE) ranking. 430,805 Altmetric mentions (2021), The Journal Impact Factor is defined as all citations to the journal in the current JCR year to items published in the previous two years, divided by the total number of scholarly items (these comprise articles, reviews, and proceedings papers) published in the journal in the previous two years. Timely attention to proofs will ensure the article is slated for the next possible issue. Also, because of the retrospective nature of this study, we could not conduct controlled experiments. This first-of-its-kindoption, called In Review, brought to you by our partners at Research Square, makes it easy to share a preprint of your manuscript on the Research Square platform andgives you real time updates onyour manuscripts progress through peer review. Brief definitions for each of the metrics used to measure the influence of our journals are included below the journal metrics. Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. Thus, our unit of analysis is identified by three elements: the manuscript, the corresponding author, and the journal. Search. 0000047727 00000 n Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance, Timescale to publish an article for a Springer journal, Page numbers in a Continuous Article Publishing (CAP) Journal. manuscripts originally submitted to a journal and subsequently transferred to another journal which was deemed a better fit by the editor. This study provides insight on authors behaviour when submitting to high-impact journals. "Editor decision started" means that the editor is actively reading the manuscript. 0000012294 00000 n The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model 0000004388 00000 n We only considered 83,256 (out of the 106,373) manuscripts for which the gender assigned to the corresponding authors name by Gender API had a confidence score of at least 80 and the gender was either male or female (the Gender Dataset, excluding transfers). Renee Wever. If you still have questions about what In Review can do for you or how it works, read our FAQ. The final dataset was further processed and then analysed statistically using the statistical programming language R, version 3.4.0. After manually checking a sample of gender assignments and their scores, we kept the gender returned by Gender API where the accuracy was at least 80 and assigned a value NA otherwise. sean penn parkinson's disease 2021. korttidsminne test siffror; lng eller kort pipa hagel. The author needs to submit the revised manuscript along with a point-by-point response to the reviewer comments. Are there differences related to gender or institution within the same review model? 0000007398 00000 n PLOS ONE. Proofs are sent before publication; authors are welcome to discuss proposed changes with Nature's subeditors, but Nature reserves the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. This measure is roughly analogous to the 5-Year Journal Impact Factor in that it is a ratio of a journal's citation influence to the size of the journal's article contribution over a period of five years. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). The Publications Ethics Committee is composed of a chair and two members appointed by the RSNA Board. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Yes What happens after my manuscript is accepted? A Pearsons chi-square test found a significant, but small association between institution group and review type (2=656.95, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.106). . First, we calculated the acceptance rate by gender, regardless of review type (Table12). by | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. EDR is employed by Macmillan Publishers Ltd, which publishes the Nature-branded journals. Plast Reconstr Surg. Help Us Celebrate Legal Talent. While these shortcomings of the data are beyond our control, we have made it clear in the Results section when and why we have excluded a subset of the dataset in each aspect of the analysis. A study of the distribution of gender among reviewers and editors of the Frontiers journals showed an underrepresentation of women in the process, as well as a same-gender preference (homophily) [10]. This study is the first one that analyses and compares the uptake and outcome of manuscripts submitted to scientific journals covering a wide range of disciplines depending on the review model chosen by the author (double-blind vs. single-blind peer review). However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. Corrected proofs returned by author 5. The result was a p value below 0.05, which shows that removing any of the predictors would harm the fit of the best model. We would like to thank Michelle Samarasinghe for the help in collecting the data from the manuscript tracking system and Sowmya Swaminathan for the comments on the study and feedback on the manuscript draft. Table2 displays the uptake by journal group and shows that the review model distribution changes as a function of the journal tier, with the proportion of double-blind papers decreasing for tiers with comparatively higher perceived prestige. Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Survey on open peer review: attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. I am not a robot. The motivation behind Nature Communications is to provide authors with more choice; both in terms of where they publish, and what access model they want for their papers.At present NPG does not provide a rapid publishing opportunity for authors with high-quality specialist work within the Nature branded titles. I have a revised manuscript which I submitted to Nature Communications. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. The status of the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned' for about 24 days. Papers. We fitted logistic regression models and report details on their goodness of fit. 20000 characters with spaces), Research Articles (25000-40000 characters with spaces), . We calculated that, at this rate, it would take us several decades to collect sufficient data that would result in statistically significant results, so another strategy is required, e.g. You can see an example in the article above. What does a status change from "Manuscript submitted" to "To author In our case, the option that the outcome is subject to a complex combination of soft constraints or incentives is possible, which supports our simpler approach of evaluating the variables with the bivariate approach we have reported on. The "satiscing," process-oriented view is based primarily on Simon's (1979) work on. The system will also immediately post a preprint of your manuscript to the In Review section of Research Square, in easy-to-read HTML, and with a citeable DOI. Back to top. If we compare male authors and female authors acceptance rates for SBPR papers (44 vs. 46%), we find that there is not a significant difference in female authors and male authors for SBPR-accepted manuscripts (results of two-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction test: 2=3.6388, df=1, p value=0.05645). 15 days You can make one of the following decisions: Accept, Revise or Reject. authors opting for DBPR should not post on preprint archives). However, we recommend you check the Junk/ Spam folder in your mailbox to see if the journal's decision letter is present. A useful set of articles providing general advice about writing and submitting scientific papers can Manuscript # . Each review is due in ten days, and many of them do arrive in two weeks. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. . May 2022 lewmar 185tt bow thruster parts . If authors choose DBPR, their details (names and affiliations) are removed from the manuscript files, and it is the authors responsibility to ensure their own anonymity throughout the text and beyond (e.g. All other data has been produced by Clarivate Analytics. The journal Immediacy Index indicates how quickly articles in a journal are cited. Tulare Ca Obituaries, Authors will need to create an account (i.e., password) before logging in to see the dashboard. . It is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the JCR year by the total number of articles published in the five previous years. volume3, Articlenumber:5 (2018) Both authors designed the study and contributed equally to the Results section. In spite of the presence of explicit instructions to authors, this type of review model has sometimes been shown to fail to hide authors identity. palabras en latn con significados bonitos. Papers. Usage: The corresponding author takes responsibility for the manuscript during the submission, peer review and production process. Author uptake for double-blind submissions was 12% (12,631 out of 106,373). Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage : r/labrats - Reddit Once all author information has been resolved and extraneous or incorrect information removed, the system will guide you to the Manuscript Information tab. 0000062196 00000 n The results were significant for all pairs: group 1 vs. group 2 (2=15.961, df=1, p value <0.001); group 2 vs. group 3 (2=7.1264, df=1, p value=0.0227); and group 1 vs. group 3 (2=37.304, df=1, p value <0.001). A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). If you have no email from the journal and have already checked the spam folder of your mailbox, you may check if the submission . Table1 displays the number and proportion of transfers by journal group. This may be due to the higher quality of the papers from more prestigious institutions or to an editor bias towards institutional prestige, or both. Help us to improve this site, send feedback. This is known as a rescinding. So, in October 2018, we added a new . The Nature Portfolio Bioengineering Community is a community blog for readers and authors of Nature Research journals, including Nature Biomedical Engineering, Nature Biotechnology, Nature . The outcome both at first decision and post review is significantly more negative (i.e. We employed descriptive statistics for data exploration, and we tested our hypotheses using Pearsons chi-square and binomial tests. 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. 2009;4(1):624. The full model has a pseudo R2 of 0.03, and the binned plot of the models residuals against the expected values also shows a poor fit. The author can request that the deadline be extended by writing to the editor in advance. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings. national association of state directors of developmental disabilities service, how many years did juan carlos serve as king. All papers submitted from January 2016 qualify for this scheme. Our commitment to early sharing and transparency in peer review inspires us to think about how to help our authors in new ways. Correspondence to In a systematic review and meta-analysis of biomedical journals investigating the interventions aimed at improving the quality of peer review in these publications, the authors reported that DBPR did not affect the quality of the peer review report or rejection rate [4]. botln botkyrka kommun. Methods Data includes 128,454 manuscripts . editors waits for him to send his comments then they contact the author and make a decision on the basis of these reports and send you acceptance, rejection or revision based on their reports . More specifically, the proportion of authors choosing DBPR is lower for higher ranking institution groups; in the uptake analysis by country, China and the USA stand out for their strong preference for DBPR and SBPR, respectively. Authors must sign into CTS with the email address to which the link was sent. As a matter of fact, the models accuracy (as tested on a random sample of 20% of the data chosen as test set) is 0.88, and the model always predicts author choices for SB, which is the majority class. Decisions are to be made by consensus. When analysing uptake data by journal tier, we have included both direct submissions and transfers incoming to each journal group, for a total of 128,457 manuscripts that were submitted to one of the 25 Nature-branded journals. Updates appear on the public peer review timeline as the manuscript progresses through peer review* (*Not available on Nature-branded journals.). The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a couple of months depending on the nature of revisions and the field of study. Submission Experiences Duration from Submission to the First Editorial Decision How many days did the entire process take? We note here that, in recent years, trends in scholarly publishing have emerged that strongly propose transparent, or open, peer review as a model that could potentially improve the quality and robustness of the peer review process [18]. Among the studies dealing with institutional bias, an analysis of abstracts submitted to the American Heart Associations annual Scientific Sessions research meeting from 2000 to 2004 found some evidence of bias favouring authors from English-speaking countries and prestigious institutions [14]. In future works, we will consider studying the post-decision outcome also in relation to the gender of reviewers and defining a quality metric for manuscripts in order to isolate the effect of bias. This may occur as a consequence of positive referee bias towards institution groups or to quality factors. BMC Med. Data are collected annually for full calendar years. JAMA. The overall uptake of DBPR is 12%, corresponding to 12,631 manuscripts, while for 93,742 manuscripts, the authors chose the single-blind option. Information for other options are available on our Springer Nature Transfer Desk page. Table3 shows the distribution of DBPR and SBPR in the three gender categories. We are a world leading research, educational and professional publisher. A list of links to the Manuscript Tracking System login pages for each journal is available on the Nature Portfolio Journals A-Z webpage. What does the status of my submission mean in Editorial Manager? Examines all aspects of your scientific document. Linkping University. Double-blind peer review (DBPR) has been proposed as a means to avoid implicit bias from peer reviewers against characteristics of authors such as gender, country of origin, or institution. Does double-blind review benefit female authors? The dataset consisted of 133,465 unique records, with 63,552 different corresponding authors and 209,057 different institution names. 0000062401 00000 n The present study focusses on the effects of this publisher intervention in the 2years following implementation and can guide others when evaluating the consequences of introducing DBPR to their journals. I am confused since the current status was already passed before the editors sent the manuscript out for review. Next, we focussed on a potential institutional bias and looked at the relationship between OTR rate and institutional prestige as measured by the groups defined based on THE ranking explained above (excluding the fourth group, for which no THE ranking was available), regardless of review type (Table9). Please try your request again later. Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. Research Square converts the manuscript to HTML, assigns a DOI, and posts on the platform with a CC-BY license. Proc Natl Acad Sci. We studied whether papers were accepted or rejected following peer review, and we included transfers because the editorial decisions as different journals follow different criteria. The aims of this study are to analyse the demographics of corresponding authors choosing double-blind peer review and to identify differences in the editorial outcome of manuscripts depending on their review model. Bruce R, Chauvin A, Trinquart L, Ravaud P, Boutron I. An Editor has been assigned, and has not yet taken an action that triggers some other status. We excluded the records for which the assigned gender was NA and focussed on a dataset of 17,167 records, of which 2849 (17%) had a female corresponding author and 14,318 (83%) had a male corresponding author. See How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? All communication from submission to publication will be with the corresponding author. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. Please enter your feedback to submit this form, Journal Article Publishing Support Center. It is calculated by multiplying the Eigenfactor Score by 0.01 and dividing by the number of articles in the journal, normalized as a fraction of all articles in all publications. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01102.x. The status changed to "Manuscript under editorial consideration" last night without it changing to "Editor decision started" like in other examples. 2006;295(14):167580. We found that DBPR papers that are sent to review have an acceptance rate that is significantly lower than that of SBPR papers. So, in October 2018, we added a new option for you when you submit to select Springer Nature journals. In Review. You should have received an email detailing the changes needed to your submission. Our results show that we cannot say that there is a significant difference between authors from prestigious institutions and authors from less prestigious institutions for DBPR-accepted manuscripts. The binned plot of the models residuals against the expected values also shows a poor fit. Nature and Nature Communications are to follow in due course. How do I find and access my journal's submission system. 0000004498 00000 n Journal-integrated preprint sharing fromSpringer Nature and Research Square, Share your preprint and trackyour manuscripts review progress with ourIn Review service. Moreover, the two models do not have to be exclusive;one could think of a DBPR stage followed by full public disclosure of reviewers and editors identities and reports. Transfer of papers between Cell Press journals and Molecular Plant. . Help us improve this article with your feedback. In order to measure any quality effect, we tested the null hypothesis that the populations (institution group 1, 2, and 3) have the same proportion of accepted manuscripts for DBPR manuscripts with a test for equality of proportions (proportion of accepted manuscripts 0.37 for group 1, 0.31 for group 2, and 0.23 for group 3). Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. The multivariate regression analyses we performed led to uninformative models that did not fit the data well when the response was author uptake, out-to-review decision, or acceptance decision, and the predictors were review type, author gender, author institution, author country, and journal tier. For example, a report showed that 34% of 880 manuscripts submitted to two radiology journals contained information that would either potentially or definitely reveal the identities of the authors or their institution [2]. This means that there is a statistically significant difference between the three groups. by | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort Correct the online article. We investigated the uptake of double-blind review in relation to journal tier, as well as gender, country, and institutional prestige of the corresponding author. What does the status of my submission mean in Editorial Manager? - Elsevier More information regarding the approach taken to derive the median citation can be found here. . the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in 2000;90(4):71541. However, we find that a logarithmic-based categorization of this sort would be more representative than a linear-based one. All authors are encouraged to update their demographic and expertise information during the confirmation step. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: experimental evidence from The American Economic Review. Posted by May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska Abstract: The abstract not exceeding 150 words and preferably in . 0000005727 00000 n Decision Sent to Author 2020-07-09 08:38:16 Decision Pending 2020-06-29 08:28:42 Under Review 2020-06-25 09:38:03 Under Editorial Consideration 2020-06-23 10:09:56 Manuscript Submission 2020-04-09 14:44:05 Stage Start Date Manuscript Ready for Publication 2020-07-16 10:45:24 . How Many Seats Are Premium Economy On Emirates A380? All communication from submission to publication will be with the corresponding author. The results on author uptake show that DBPR is chosen more frequently by authors that submit to higher impact journals within the portfolio, by authors from certain countries, and by authors from less prestigious institutions. As mentioned in the Methods section, we have used a commercial algorithm to attribute gender based on first names, and discarded records that could not be matched with accuracy greater than 80%. In order to test whether the proportions in different groups were the same, we used the test of equal proportions in R (command prop.test). Nature Portfolio is a signatory of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (see here for more information about our endorsement). Nature Communications is an open access, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the biological, physical, chemical and Earth sciences. I submitted a paper in a journal. It's showing under consideration for 0000011063 00000 n We discuss the limitations of the study in more detail in the Discussion section. 2022.6.13 Editor Decision Started. The target number of required reviews has been completed, and the Handling Editor is considering the reviews. How Many Seats Are Premium Economy On Emirates A380?, For most of our journals the corresponding author can track the article online. This can potentially skew our results if, for example, there are differences in the proportion of names that cannot be attributed between genders. This choice of categories is arbitrary, e.g. Therefore, in the DBPR case, we can conclude that there is a significant difference between the OTR rate of papers by male corresponding authors and the OTR rate of papers by female corresponding authors. The study reported on here is the first one that focusses on Nature-branded journals, with the overall aim to investigate whether there is any implicit bias in peer review in these journals and ultimately understand whether DBPR is an effective measure in removing referee bias and improving the peer review of scientific literature.
Nba G League Average Attendance, Articles D